From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SALY v. KEARNY

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 28, 1966
90 N.J. Super. 144 (App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

Argued January 3, 1966 —

Decided January 28, 1966.

Appeal from The Hudson County Court, Law Division.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Peter A. Adams argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Robert J. McCurrie argued the cause for respondent.


In this workmen's compensation case the sole question involved was whether a public employee, who retired on a disability pension following a work-connected injury, was entitled to receive payment from respondent for medical services required subsequent to his retirement under N.J.S.A. 34:15-43, without respondent's right to reimbursement therefor, under N.J.S.A. 34:15-40, from monies received by the employee from a third-party tortfeasor. The Division of Workmen's Compensation ruled that respondent had no right to reimbursement. On appeal, the County Court held otherwise.

We conclude that the judgment of the County Court must be affirmed, essentially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Schulman, reported at 85 N.J. Super. 586 ( Cty. Ct. 1964).


Summaries of

SALY v. KEARNY

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 28, 1966
90 N.J. Super. 144 (App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

SALY v. KEARNY

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH SALY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TOWN OF KEARNY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jan 28, 1966

Citations

90 N.J. Super. 144 (App. Div. 1966)
216 A.2d 418

Citing Cases

Ziegler v. State

134 N.J.L., at p. 419. See Saly v. Town of Kearny, 85 N.J. Super. 586, 588-589 ( Cty. Ct. 1964), affirmed…

Detlefs v. Town of Westfield

This statement makes it clear, if there could have been any reasonable doubt on the point, that the…