From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salvio v. Idone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1985
112 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 8, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Goldberg, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although we agree with appellants' contentions that evidence of codefendant Carino's default in appearance and his hearsay statements were improperly admitted into evidence, we find that these errors were harmless. The jury's special verdict found that appellant Clement Salvio was contributorily negligent and, inasmuch as this finding is amply supported by untainted evidence in the record, and the accident in question occurred prior to the effective date of the comparative negligence law, the judgment must be affirmed. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Salvio v. Idone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1985
112 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Salvio v. Idone

Case Details

Full title:CLEMENT SALVIO et al., Appellants, v. ANTHONY IDONE et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)