From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salvati v. Salvati

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 1994
208 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 3, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

While the court, upon resettlement, cannot change the substance of the judgment, it does have the power to make clerical amendments to correct provisions clearly intended by the parties (see, CPLR 5019; Haven Assocs. v. Donro Realty Corp., 149 A.D.2d 667). Here, the plaintiff proposed only a technical amendment in order to allow her to collect the pension funds she was entitled to. Therefore, we find that the Supreme Court properly amended the judgment. Mangano, P.J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Salvati v. Salvati

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 3, 1994
208 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Salvati v. Salvati

Case Details

Full title:GERALDINE SALVATI, Respondent, v. NEIL A. SALVATI, SR., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 3, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Citing Cases

Renaud v. Renaud

The defendant appeals. "Resettlement is generally intended to remedy clerical errors or clear mistakes in an…

Renaud v. Renaud

The defendant appeals. "Resettlement is generally intended to remedy clerical errors or clear mistakes in an…