From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saltzman v. City of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 17, 1948
191 Misc. 724 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)

Opinion

February 17, 1948.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, County of New York, KELLER, J.

Robert Halpern and Milton E. Sahn for appellants.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel (David M. Fuchs and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for respondent.


The enactment sought to be questioned is a reasonable exercise of the police power and is constitutional. The evidence of the prior conviction of an "infraction" or "offense" was not competent (Civ. Prac. Act, § 350; N.Y. War Emergency Act, § 100, subd. [d]; L. 1942, ch. 544). It cannot be said this evidence on the sharp issue of weight and credibility of plaintiffs' testimony did not prejudice plaintiffs. Accordingly, the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. ( Hull v. Littauer, 162 N.Y. 569.)

The judgments should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

HAMMER, CHURCH and EDER, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Saltzman v. City of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 17, 1948
191 Misc. 724 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
Case details for

Saltzman v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SAM SALTZMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. JEROME POULTRY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 17, 1948

Citations

191 Misc. 724 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
78 N.Y.S.2d 407