From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salmon v. Turner

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Aug 8, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv554-TMH (M.D. Ala. Aug. 8, 2008)

Summary

In Turner, the Supreme Court delineated four factors relevant to determining whether a prison regulation infringes on a prisoner's constitutional rights: (1) is there a valid, rational correlation between the prison regulation and the legitimate governmental interest advanced; (2) are there alternative means of exercising the rights that remain available to the prisoner; (3) what is the impact of an accommodation in favor of the inmate on prison staff, other prisoners, and the allocation of prison resources generally; and (4) do alternatives exist that would accommodate the prisoner's rights at little cost to valid prison interests.

Summary of this case from Bossio v. Robinson

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv554-TMH.

August 8, 2008


OPINION


On July 16, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 4). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I).


Summaries of

Salmon v. Turner

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Aug 8, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv554-TMH (M.D. Ala. Aug. 8, 2008)

In Turner, the Supreme Court delineated four factors relevant to determining whether a prison regulation infringes on a prisoner's constitutional rights: (1) is there a valid, rational correlation between the prison regulation and the legitimate governmental interest advanced; (2) are there alternative means of exercising the rights that remain available to the prisoner; (3) what is the impact of an accommodation in favor of the inmate on prison staff, other prisoners, and the allocation of prison resources generally; and (4) do alternatives exist that would accommodate the prisoner's rights at little cost to valid prison interests.

Summary of this case from Bossio v. Robinson
Case details for

Salmon v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:JERRY SALMON, Plaintiff, v. KIM TURNER, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 8, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv554-TMH (M.D. Ala. Aug. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Snell v. Daniels

This court has routinely and consistently applied the holding of Rodriguez-Mora to dismiss due process claims…

Bossio v. Robinson

This court has routinely and consistently applied the holding of Hudson to dismiss due process claims brought…