From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salmon v. Carillo

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 2, 2000
222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000)

Opinion

No. 96-55707 D.C. No. CV-95-03554-DT.

Filed August 2, 2000.

Before: Otto R. Skopil, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029 (2000), it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner's plea-related and appeal-related ineffectiveness of counsel claims. With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Salmon v. Carillo

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 2, 2000
222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000)
Case details for

Salmon v. Carillo

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN SALMON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. CARILLO; DANIEL E. LUNGREN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 2, 2000

Citations

222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000)