From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salmans v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 12, 2023
No. 2023-UP-018 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2023-UP-018 Appellate Case 2022-001136

01-12-2023

Serena Joy Stacy Salmans and Dillon Levi Salmans, Respondents, v. Nakeisha McDonald, Charles Sabb, and South Carolina Department of Social Services, Defendants, Of whom Nakeisha McDonald is the Appellant and Charles Sabb and South Carolina Department of Social Services are Respondents. In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of Union, for Appellant. Larry Dale Dove, of Thompson Dove Law Group LLC, of Rock Hill, for Respondents Serena Joy Stacy Salmans and Dillon Levi Salmans. Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services. Charles Saab, of North Charleston, pro se. Almand James Barron, of The Law Offices of Shea and Barron, of Columbia, as the Guardian ad Litem.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 5, 2023

Appeal From Richland County C. Vance Stricklin, Jr., Family Court Judge

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of Union, for Appellant.

Larry Dale Dove, of Thompson Dove Law Group LLC, of Rock Hill, for Respondents Serena Joy Stacy Salmans and Dillon Levi Salmans.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services. Charles Saab, of North Charleston, pro se. Almand James Barron, of The Law Offices of Shea and Barron, of Columbia, as the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM

Nakeisha McDonald appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve McDonald's counsel.

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Salmans v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 12, 2023
No. 2023-UP-018 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Salmans v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:Serena Joy Stacy Salmans and Dillon Levi Salmans, Respondents, v. Nakeisha…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 12, 2023

Citations

No. 2023-UP-018 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 12, 2023)