From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salman v. Econo Lodge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2003
303 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-01238

March 21, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Niagara County (Fricano, J.), entered February 15, 2002, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

ABBARNO, McLAUGHLIN KEDZIELAWA, BUFFALO (KEVIN M. STADELMAIER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BROWN KELLY, LLP, BUFFALO (NICOLE B. PALMERTON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, WISNER, KEHOE, AND GORSKI, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, which alleges false arrest. A cause of action for false arrest accrues when the confinement terminates (see Kramer v. Herrera, 176 A.D.2d 1241; Boose v. City of Rochester, 71 A.D.2d 59, 64-65). The record establishes that plaintiff was arrested on August 21, 2000 for theft of services, based on his alleged refusal to pay for a room at defendant hotel that his family had occupied for several hours. Plaintiff was released from police custody on August 22, 2000 but did not commence this action until October 15, 2001. Thus, this action is time-barred (see CPLR 215; Boose, 71 A.D.2d 59), and we need not reach any other issues.


Summaries of

Salman v. Econo Lodge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2003
303 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Salman v. Econo Lodge

Case Details

Full title:RAMI SALMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ECONO LODGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 678

Citing Cases

Roche v. Village of Tarrytown

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contentions, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant…

Rateau v. City of New York

" Section 50-e(1)(a). "In an action for false arrest or false imprisonment the GML § 50-e(1)(a) 90-day period…