From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sallie v. Hugo

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 3, 2021
6:20-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 3, 2021)

Opinion

6:20-cv-00274

09-03-2021

Rhonda Kay Sallie, Plaintiff, v. Steve Hugo et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Rhonda Sallie, a resident of Palestine, Texas proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit against assistant district attorney Steve Hugo and two private citizens, identified as Jerry Durham and Brenda Sapp. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis. Doc. 9. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge's report.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Sallie v. Hugo

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 3, 2021
6:20-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Sallie v. Hugo

Case Details

Full title:Rhonda Kay Sallie, Plaintiff, v. Steve Hugo et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 3, 2021

Citations

6:20-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 3, 2021)