From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sallette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 6, 1989
553 So. 2d 330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1908.

December 6, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, L.B. Vocelle, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, and Eric Conn, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Fees and costs were imposed against appellant without giving him adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard. This constitutes error, Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988), of fundamental proportions. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004, 1006 (Fla. 1989). We reverse and remand without prejudice to the state's right to again seek fees and costs after notice and hearing.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sallette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 6, 1989
553 So. 2d 330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Sallette v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN SALLETTE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 6, 1989

Citations

553 So. 2d 330 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Stone v. State

Thus, the extradition costs were properly assessed against Stone. See Dickson v. State, 622 So.2d 179 (Fla.…