From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salkin v. Lanson

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 22, 2008
975 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 2008)

Opinion

No. SC07-1651.

January 22, 2008.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 3D07-382.


Because Petitioners have failed to show a clear legal right to reinstatement of the appeal in Case No. 3D07-382, Petitioners are not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show clear legal right to performance of requested act, that respondent has indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Salkin v. Lanson

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 22, 2008
975 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 2008)
Case details for

Salkin v. Lanson

Case Details

Full title:SONYA L. SALKIN, ET AL. Petitioner(s) v. NORMAN LANSON, ET AL…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

Citations

975 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 2008)