From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
1:21-CV-01140-NE-JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-CV-01140-NE-JLT

09-17-2021

EMMANUEL SALINAS, on behalf of himself and the Class members, Plaintiff, v. NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY; NESTLE USA, INC.; Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (DOC. 7)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

The parties have stipulated to allow the defendants additional time to respond to the complaint because they are pursuing resolution of the case. (Doc. 7). Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:

1. The stipulation is GRANTED. The defendants SHALL file their responsive pleading no later than October 4, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
1:21-CV-01140-NE-JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Co.

Case Details

Full title:EMMANUEL SALINAS, on behalf of himself and the Class members, Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

1:21-CV-01140-NE-JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)