From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salinas v. Blinken

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 21, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-cv-00019 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 21, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:22-cv-00019

07-21-2022

JUAN ANTONIO SALINAS, “Plaintiff', v. ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ET AL, “Defendants”.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ROLANDO OLVERA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are these pleadings: Defendant's “Unopposed Motion for Partial Dismissal” (“MTD”) (Dkt. No. 8) and the “Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation” (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 15). The R&R recommends this Court (1) grant Defendant's partial MTD (Dkt. No. 8) seeking dismissal of the United States of America as a defendant in this lawsuit.

No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's ruling, the district court applies the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED.

Respondent's partial MTD (Dkt. No. 8) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to terminate United States of America as a defendant in this case.


Summaries of

Salinas v. Blinken

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 21, 2022
Civil Action 1:22-cv-00019 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Salinas v. Blinken

Case Details

Full title:JUAN ANTONIO SALINAS, “Plaintiff', v. ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ET AL…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 21, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:22-cv-00019 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 21, 2022)