From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saleh v. Time Warner Cable

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 11, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2782-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. May. 11, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2782-G (BN)

05-11-2017

FAISEL SALEH, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. An objection was filed by plaintiff. The district court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED. May 11, 2017.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Saleh v. Time Warner Cable

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 11, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2782-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. May. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Saleh v. Time Warner Cable

Case Details

Full title:FAISEL SALEH, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 11, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2782-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. May. 11, 2017)

Citing Cases

Shastry v. U.S. Bank

The undersigned will consider the MTD as asserted under Rule 12(c), applying the same standard for dismissal…

Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank

The undersigned will consider the MTD as asserted under Rule 12(c), applying the same standard for dismissal…