From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saldana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 11, 2009
17 So. 3d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 5D08-4048.

July 31, 2009. Rehearing Denied September 11, 2009.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Bob Wattles, Judge.

Ruben Saldana, Perry, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahasee, and Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We affirm the appealed order. Moreover, after having painstakingly collected and reviewed this appellant's series of post-conviction filings and appeals, which are remarkable for their incoherence, inaccuracy and frivolousness, we deem it appropriate to order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999), that appellant Saldana show cause within ten days from the date of this opinion why he should not be barred from any further pro se filings in this court concerning his 1992 and 1999 convictions.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Saldana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 11, 2009
17 So. 3d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Saldana v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ruben SALDANA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 11, 2009

Citations

17 So. 3d 338 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)