From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saldana v. St. Andre

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 31, 2022
2:22-cv-00801-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00801-TLN-EFB

10-31-2022

SAMUEL SALDANA, Plaintiff, v. ST. ANDRE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 21, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 21, 2022 (ECF No. 18) are ADOPTED in full; and

2. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Kersh are DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Saldana v. St. Andre

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 31, 2022
2:22-cv-00801-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Saldana v. St. Andre

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL SALDANA, Plaintiff, v. ST. ANDRE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 31, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00801-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2022)