From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salcido v. Runnels

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 31, 2002
C 02-4637 MJJ (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2002)

Opinion

C 02-4637 MJJ (PR)

October 31, 2002


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


This habeas petition was filed in this court on September 25, 2002. On that same day, the court notified petitioner he had neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed in forma pauperis was provided with the notice, along with a return envelope and instructions for completing the application. Petitioner was informed that if he did not either pay the fee or file the application within thirty days the case would be dismissed. No response has been received. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk shall close this file, and all pending motions are terminated. No fee is due in this action.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issued have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Salcido v. Runnels

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 31, 2002
C 02-4637 MJJ (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2002)
Case details for

Salcido v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN S. SALCIDO, Petitioner v. D.L. RUNNELS, Respondents

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 31, 2002

Citations

C 02-4637 MJJ (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2002)

Citing Cases

State v. Lum

The Supreme Court of California put it well: Salcido v. Runnels, 2007 WL 2900426 at n.1 (N.D. Cal.)("Juror…