From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salcido v. Conrad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0611 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0611 LKK KJN P

10-19-2011

MARTIN SALCIDO, Plaintiff, v. CONRAD and RICE, 1Defendants.


ORDER

By an order filed May 20, 2011, this court directed the United States Marshal to serve all process without prepayment of costs. On June 29, 2011, the Marshal returned the summons and complaint indicating service on defendant Conrad had been executed. Defendant Conrad, although properly served, has not yet filed a responsive pleading. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Court records indicate that defendant Conrad accepted service on June 10, 2011. (Dkt. No. 14 at 1.)
--------

1. Defendant Conrad show cause, within twenty-one days from the date of this order, why default should not be entered;

2. The Clerk of the Court shall forward a copy of this order to defendant Correctional Officer Conrad, California State Prison-Solano, 2100 Peabody Road, Vacaville, California 95696; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Monica Anderson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Salcido v. Conrad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0611 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Salcido v. Conrad

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN SALCIDO, Plaintiff, v. CONRAD and RICE, 1Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0611 LKK KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)