From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salazar v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
1:06-cv-01777-OWW-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)

Opinion

1:06-cv-01777-OWW-TAG (HC).

May 13, 2008


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE (Doc. 20)


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 22, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for a 60-day extension time to file a traverse. (Doc. 20).

Good cause having been presented to the Court and good cause appearing therefore, Petitioner's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:

1. Petitioner's request for an extension of time to file a traverse is granted, but only until May 27, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Salazar v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
1:06-cv-01777-OWW-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Salazar v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:JERRY MENDEZ SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

1:06-cv-01777-OWW-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)