From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salazar v. Spearman

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 31, 2022
LACV 19-8996-JAK (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 31, 2022)

Opinion

LACV 19-8996-JAK (LAL)

05-31-2022

GILBERT SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.


Summaries of

Salazar v. Spearman

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 31, 2022
LACV 19-8996-JAK (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Salazar v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:GILBERT SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. M.E. SPEARMAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 31, 2022

Citations

LACV 19-8996-JAK (LAL) (C.D. Cal. May. 31, 2022)