From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salazar v. Moyhihan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2012
No. CIV-S-11-3276-GEB-KJN-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-11-3276-GEB-KJN-PS

08-01-2012

DAVID JOSEPH SALAZAR, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN T. MOYHIHAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On July 5, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 5, 2012, are ADOPTED;

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); and

3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case and vacate all dates.

_____________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Salazar v. Moyhihan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2012
No. CIV-S-11-3276-GEB-KJN-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Salazar v. Moyhihan

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JOSEPH SALAZAR, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN T. MOYHIHAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

No. CIV-S-11-3276-GEB-KJN-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2012)