From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salazar v. Macys Retail Holdings, LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 5, 2024
2:24-cv-06613-RGK-SSC (C.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-06613-RGK-SSC

09-05-2024

MARIA SALAZAR v. MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC


Present The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Jurisdiction

On June 13, 2024, Maria Salazar (“Plaintiff”) filed a personal injury action against Macys Retail Holdings, LLC and Schindler Elevator Corp. (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging a negligence and premises liability. On August 5, 2024, Macys removed the action on the ground of diversity jurisdiction. However, in its notice, Macys summarily states that amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. The Court hereby orders Macys to show cause in writing why this action should not be remanded to state court. An adequate response must include facts that establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Macys' response is limited to 5 pages in length, and due no later than September 12, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Salazar v. Macys Retail Holdings, LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 5, 2024
2:24-cv-06613-RGK-SSC (C.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Salazar v. Macys Retail Holdings, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MARIA SALAZAR v. MACYS RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 5, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-06613-RGK-SSC (C.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2024)