From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salas v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2007
No. CIV S-04-2550 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2550 GEB CMK P.

August 17, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 12) is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Salas v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2007
No. CIV S-04-2550 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Salas v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:PAUL SALAS, Sr., Petitioner, v. DAVID RUNNELS, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2550 GEB CMK P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2007)