From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salas v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 14, 2020
No. CV 17-3729-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2020)

Opinion

No. CV 17-3729-CAS (AGR)

04-14-2020

ANDREW JOSHUA SALAS, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismissing the Strickler subclaim of Ground Three with prejudice, and dismissing the remaining claims without prejudice as unexhausted. DATED: April 14, 2020

/s/_________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Salas v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 14, 2020
No. CV 17-3729-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Salas v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW JOSHUA SALAS, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 14, 2020

Citations

No. CV 17-3729-CAS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2020)