From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saks v. Rogers

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jun 20, 2016
No. 04-16-00286-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 20, 2016)

Opinion

No. 04-16-00286-CV

06-20-2016

MARGARET LANDEN SAKS AND PHILIP M. ROSS, Appellant v. MARCUS P. ROGERS, A. CHRIS HEINRICHS, J. BARRETT SHIPP AND HEINRICHS & DE GENNARO, P.C., Appellee


From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2011-PC-3466B
Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This court has determined this appeal is appropriate for referral to alternative dispute resolution (ADR). 4TH TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. R. 2. All further communications with this court by the parties regarding ADR shall be directed to the clerk of the court.

All parties are ORDERED to respond in writing by July 5, 2016 stating: (1) any objection to mediation; and (2) whether the parties agree on the selection of a mediator and, if so, the name and address of the mediator of their choice.

If the parties agree to mediation and select a mediator, this court will issue an order suspending all appellate deadlines for forty-five days to allow the parties to concentrate on the scheduling and completion of the mediation process.

Is it so ORDERED on June 20, 2016.

/s/_________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on June 20, 2016.

/s/_________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk


Summaries of

Saks v. Rogers

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jun 20, 2016
No. 04-16-00286-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Saks v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET LANDEN SAKS AND PHILIP M. ROSS, Appellant v. MARCUS P. ROGERS, A…

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jun 20, 2016

Citations

No. 04-16-00286-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 20, 2016)