From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sajor v. Ampol, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

September, 1934.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ. Settle order on notice.


In order that the defendants may have an opportunity to present testimony claimed to be available, which, if credited, it is claimed may affect the conclusions stated in our prior decision, the motion for reargument is granted and upon reargument the decision of this court dated June 15, 1934 [ ante, p. 655], is modified so as to provide for a reversal of the judgment on the law and the facts, with costs to appellants, and the granting of a new trial. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed.


Summaries of

Sajor v. Ampol, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Sajor v. Ampol, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KASIMIR SAJOR, Appellant, v. AMPOL, INC., and MAX F. WEGRZYNEK, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)