From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sainz v. Sainz

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 24, 1996
936 S.W.2d 854 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 69752

OPINION FILED: December 24, 1996

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY HON. FRANK A. CONARD.

Harold G. Johnson, Mitchel D. Johnson, St. Ann, for petitioner/appellant.

Jeffrey T. McPherson, Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly Davis, St. Louis, for respondent/respondent.

Before: Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, J., and Gaertner, J.



ORDER


Mother appeals the trial court's judgment modifying the decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Sainz v. Sainz

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Dec 24, 1996
936 S.W.2d 854 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Sainz v. Sainz

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. SAINZ, Petitioner/Appellant, v. MARY S. SAINZ…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Dec 24, 1996

Citations

936 S.W.2d 854 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)