From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saintal v. Foster

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00445-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-00445-KJD-PAL.

October 17, 2011


ORDER (Mot. Strike — Dkt. #22)


Before the court is the Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. #22). No opposition was filed and the time for filing a response has now run.

Defendants seek an order striking three documents filed by the Plaintiff after the court entered a Screening Order (Dkt. #10), and Order Setting Inmate Early Mediation Conference (Dkt. #15). Specifically, Plaintiff filed a 78-page Amended Memorandum of Law in Support of Civil Rights Complaint (Dkt. #12), Notice and Motion of Informative [sic] to Judge Regarding Discretions with Mediation (Dkt. #18), and Motion for Transfer and Grounds of Prejudice (Dkt. #19). Having reviewed and considered the matter, the court finds Plaintiff filed these documents in contravention of the court's orders. Additionally, Plaintiff did not file an opposition to Defendants' motion to strike, and pursuant to LR 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. #22) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Amended Memorandum (Dkt. #12), Notice of Motion (Dkt. #18), and Motion for Transfer (Dkt. #19) are STRICKEN.

Dated this 12th day of October, 2011.


Summaries of

Saintal v. Foster

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 17, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00445-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Saintal v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:PRISCELLA R. SAINTAL, Plaintiff, v. SHERYL FOSTER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-00445-KJD-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)