From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saint Louis Univ. v. Medtronic Navigation, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 4, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02445-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02445-PAB-BNB

02-04-2013

SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY, a Missouri benevolent corporation, Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC., f/k/a Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC., an Indiana corporation, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

This matter is before the Court on defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 29]. On January 30, 2013, plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 40] pursuant to the Minute Order [Docket No. 39] granting plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 33]. Thus, the Second Amended Complaint became the operative pleading in this action, and the Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 29] is directed to an inoperative, superseded pleading. See, e.g., Gilles v. United States, 906 F.2d 1386, 1389 (10th Cir. 1990) ("a pleading that has been amended under Rule 15(a) supersedes the pleading it modifies") (internal quotation marks omitted). As such, the motion to dismiss is moot. It is

ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 29] is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Saint Louis Univ. v. Medtronic Navigation, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 4, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02445-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Saint Louis Univ. v. Medtronic Navigation, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY, a Missouri benevolent corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 4, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02445-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 4, 2013)