From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saif Corporation v. Atchley

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 2, 1994
884 P.2d 867 (Or. 1994)

Opinion

WCB 91-05626; CA A76029; SC S40914

Submitted January 19, 1994

December 2, 1994

In Banc

Edward J. Harri, of Malagon, Moore, Johnson, Jensen Correll, Eugene, filed the petition for petitioner on review.

David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed a response for respondents on review. With him on the response were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or. 192, 881 P.2d 773 (1994).


Summaries of

Saif Corporation v. Atchley

Oregon Supreme Court
Dec 2, 1994
884 P.2d 867 (Or. 1994)
Case details for

Saif Corporation v. Atchley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Deborah K. Atchley, Claimant. SAIF…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 2, 1994

Citations

884 P.2d 867 (Or. 1994)
884 P.2d 867

Citing Cases

Saif Corporation v. Atchley

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Richardson, Chief Judge, and Leeson, Judge. On remand from the Oregon…