From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Said v. AL-Adhab

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 6, 2022
8:21-mc-84-WFJ-SPF (M.D. Fla. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

8:21-mc-84-WFJ-SPF

01-06-2022

MOHAMED FATHY SAID, Plaintiff, v. AISHA AHMED H O AL-ADHAB, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAM F. JUNUG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. 1). The magistrate judge issued a thorough and well-reasoned report recommending the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. 7. Plaintiff timely filed objections. Dkt. 8.

When a party makes timely and specific objections to the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the district judge shall conduct a de novo review of the portions of the record to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); Jeffrey S. v. State Bd. of Educ. of State of Ga., 896 F.2d 507, 512 (11th Cir. 1990). After such independent review, the Court may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); Macort v. Prem., Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 783-84 (11th Cir. 2006) (citing published opinions).

The magistrate judge found that the complaint (a form Criminal Complaint AO 91) fails to satisfy basic pleading requirements-most notably the Plaintiff lacks standing to criminally prosecute another. As noted, “this deficiency cannot be cured by amendment [and therefore] Plaintiff need not be afforded with the opportunity to amend his complaint.” Dkt. 7 at 2. The Court agrees, particularly in view of the seven similar complaints in this district that are now consolidated into the lead case of Said v. Ministry of Interior, et al., 8:21-cv-1073-WFJ-CPT. Dkt. 7 at 2 n.1. For the reasons explained by the magistrate judge, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court concludes that the report and recommendation (Dkt. 7) should be adopted as part of this order, confirmed, and approved in all respects. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:

1. The report and recommendation (Dkt. 7) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and made a part of this order.
2. Plaintiffs complaint (Dkt. 1) is dismissed with prejudice.
3. All other pending motions (Dkts. 3, 6) are denied.
4. The Clerk is directed to close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Said v. AL-Adhab

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 6, 2022
8:21-mc-84-WFJ-SPF (M.D. Fla. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Said v. AL-Adhab

Case Details

Full title:MOHAMED FATHY SAID, Plaintiff, v. AISHA AHMED H O AL-ADHAB, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

8:21-mc-84-WFJ-SPF (M.D. Fla. Jan. 6, 2022)