Opinion
No. 30323
February 25, 2010.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Case No. 1DTI-09-167852)
By: MOON, C.J., NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, DUFFY, and RECKTENWALD, JJ.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of prohibition filed by petitioner David Keanu Sai and the papers in support, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of prohibition is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.) Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.