Saganis-Noonan v. Koenig

3 Citing cases

  1. Sisk v. Union Pacific Railroad

    138 S.W.3d 799 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 15 times

    The Eastern District first adopted the four-factor "test," utilized by Herod, in Jackson v. Christian Salveson Holdings, Inc., 914 S.W.2d 878, 883 (Mo.App. 1996). The sources cited by Jackson for the four-factor test were the Eastern District's earlier case of Saganis-Noonan v. Koenig, 857 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Mo.App. 1993), and the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit's case of Spiegelv. Trustees of Tufts College, 843 F.2d 38 (1st Cir. 1988). Jackson, 914 S.W.2d at 883.

  2. Crawford v. Distrib. Operations, Inc.

    561 S.W.3d 463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 4 times

    The case is still pending before the trial court, which generally weighs against an early appeal. SeeSaganis-Noonan v. Koenig , 857 S.W.2d 499, 502 (Mo.App. E.D. 1993). However, because the three remaining factors weigh in favor of finding there was no just reason for delay, we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in certifying its judgment for appeal.

  3. Christian Cty. v. Missouri Partners

    306 S.W.3d 687 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 1 times

    The four factors are: 1) whether the action remains pending in the trial court as to all parties; 2) whether similar relief can be awarded in each separate count; 3) whether determination of the claims pending in the trial court would moot the claim being appealed; and 4) whether the factual underpinning of all the claims are intertwined.Id.; see Saganis-Noonan v. Koenig, 857 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Mo.App. 1993). BATES, P.J., and BURRELL, J., concur.