From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safrin v. Joe Friedman Hat Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 1949
276 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

December 12, 1949.


In an action to recover overtime compensation together with damages and attorney's fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U.S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.), plaintiff appeals from an order entered June 8, 1949, denying his motion to substitute "Joe Friedman Hat Co., a partnership" in place of the corporation named as defendant. The order appealed from, which has not been printed in the record, was superseded by an order of resettlement, entered September 23, 1949, and, therefore, is not appealable. ( Magalhaes v. Magalhaes, 254 App. Div. 880.) Appeal dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [ 195 Misc. 387.]


Summaries of

Safrin v. Joe Friedman Hat Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 1949
276 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Safrin v. Joe Friedman Hat Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MAX SAFRIN, Appellant, v. JOE FRIEDMAN HAT CO., INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1949

Citations

276 App. Div. 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Interbartolo v. La Femina

The original judgment has been superseded by the resettled judgment, from which appeal has been taken.…

Interbartolo v. La Femina

The original judgment has been superseded by the resettled judgment, from which appeal has been taken. (…