From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safit v. Pace Univ.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 13, 2018
159 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

5974 Index 101149/16

03-13-2018

In re Ilan SAFIT, Petitioner–Appellant, v. PACE UNIVERSITY, Respondent–Respondent.

Stewart Lee Karlin Law Group, P.C., New York (Stewart L. Karlin of counsel), for appellant. Bond, Schoeneck & King, Syracuse (Laura H. Harshbarger of counsel), for respondent.


Stewart Lee Karlin Law Group, P.C., New York (Stewart L. Karlin of counsel), for appellant.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, Syracuse (Laura H. Harshbarger of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered December 5, 2016, which denied the petition challenging respondent's determination to deny petitioner tenure, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent's decision to deny petitioner tenure was not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Loebl v. New York Univ., 255 A.D.2d 257, 259, 680 N.Y.S.2d 495 [1st Dept. 1998] ; Matter of Fruehwald v. Hofstra Univ., 82 A.D.3d 1233, 1234, 920 N.Y.S.2d 183 [2d Dept. 2011] ). Contrary to petitioner's argument, he received due process during the tenure application process. In response to petitioner's complaints regarding alleged procedural issues, respondent remanded his application to the stage where the issue arose, and allowed his application to proceed anew.

Furthermore, the determination not to recommend promotion or tenure was supported by the evidence, including the affidavits of multiple faculty members and officials, which demonstrated that petitioner's application received the benefit of multiple reviews by differently constituted faculty committees, was given full and fair consideration, and was a proper exercise of academic judgment (see Pauk v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y., 62 A.D.2d 660, 664, 406 N.Y.S.2d 46 [1st Dept. 1978], affd 48 N.Y.2d 930, 425 N.Y.S.2d 92, 401 N.E.2d 214 [1979] ). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions, including that he was denied tenure because of his age, and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Safit v. Pace Univ.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 13, 2018
159 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Safit v. Pace Univ.

Case Details

Full title:In re Ilan SAFIT, Petitioner–Appellant, v. PACE UNIVERSITY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 13, 2018

Citations

159 A.D.3d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 1581
72 N.Y.S.3d 61

Citing Cases

People v. Semenets

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 159 AD3d 496 (NY)…