From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saffold v. Carey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 26, 2002
295 F.3d 1380 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

No. 99-15541.

July 26, 2002.

Before B. FLETCHER, CANBY, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.



ORDER

Appellant's motion for enlargement of time and recall of the mandate is GRANTED IN PART. The mandate of this court that issued on July 9, 2002, is recalled. The order filed by this court on July 8, 2002, is withdrawn and the court sua sponte grants rehearing.

The parties are instructed to file simultaneous briefs addressing the following question: What is the proper disposition to be ordered by this court on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, in light of the Supreme Court's opinion, Carey v. Saffold, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2134, 153 L.Ed.2d 260 (2002)?

The briefs are not to exceed twenty-five (25) double-spaced pages in length, and are to be filed on or before thirty (30) days from the date of filing of this order.


Summaries of

Saffold v. Carey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 26, 2002
295 F.3d 1380 (9th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

Saffold v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:Tony Eugene SAFFOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas L. CAREY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 26, 2002

Citations

295 F.3d 1380 (9th Cir. 2002)

Citing Cases

Baker v. Horn

We accordingly ask the district court to determine whether Saffold's petition met the California standard set…