From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saffold v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 25, 2017
No. 2:16-cv-2829 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2017)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-2829 JAM CKD P

05-25-2017

TONY EUGENE SAFFOLD, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 6, 2016, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// ///// time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: May 25, 2017

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
saff2829.fta


Summaries of

Saffold v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 25, 2017
No. 2:16-cv-2829 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Saffold v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:TONY EUGENE SAFFOLD, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 25, 2017

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-2829 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2017)