From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Progressive Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 19, 2022
Civil Action 4:21-cv-03297 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 19, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:21-cv-03297

07-19-2022

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HON. CHARLES ESKRIDGE, DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending is a motion by Plaintiff Safeco Insurance Company of America for summary judgment. Dkt 18. Defendant Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company didn't respond.

“It is well established in the Fifth Circuit that a federal court may not grant a ‘default' summary judgment when no response has been filed.” Morgan v Federal Express Corp, 114 F.Supp.3d 434, 437 (SD Tex 2015) (quotations omitted), citing Eversley v MBank of Dallas, 843 F.2d 172, 174 (5th Cir 1988). But if no response to a motion for summary judgment has been filed, the court may find as undisputed the statement of facts in the motion for summary judgment. Ibid (citations omitted).

Safeco brings a claim for declaratory judgment. Dkt 1 at 6-7. Progressive doesn't dispute the underlying facts made the basis of this action. Safeco further submits undisputed evidence and controlling law that it's entitled to judgment against Progressive because, among other reasons, (i) the Progressive policy provides primary coverage to the plaintiff in the underlying action with the Safeco policy being only for excess coverage, (ii) the “other insurance” provisions of the Safeco policy are enforceable, rendering the Progressive policy primary and the Safeco policy excess, and (iii) Safeco has no obligation for the underlying uninsured/underinsured motorist claim unless and until the Progressive policy limits are exhausted.

The motion for summary judgment by Plaintiff Safeco Insurance Company of America is GRANTED. Dkt 18.

It is hereby DECLARED that (i) Safeco has no obligation to afford coverage on a primary basis to Jeremy Barnard for the uninsured/underinsured motorist claims arising from the underlying action because the Safeco policy is excess to the Progressive policy, and (ii) Progressive has an obligation to afford coverage on a primary basis to Jeremy Barnard for the uninsured/underinsured motorist claims arising from the underlying action.

Safeco Insurance Company of America must submit a proposed form of judgment by July 29th. It should there specify whether it shall serve as a final judgment in this matter.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Progressive Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 19, 2022
Civil Action 4:21-cv-03297 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Progressive Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 19, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 4:21-cv-03297 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 19, 2022)