Opinion
2:20-cv-01579-JAD-NJK
01-18-2022
LEONARD T. FINK, ESQ., CHAD D. FUSS, ESQ., SPRINGEL & FINK LLP Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff AIR VENT, INC. JORGE A. RAMIREZ, ESQ., CHRISTOPHER D. PHIPPS, ESQ., Attorney for Third-Party Defendant, Powermax Electric Co. Ltd. Guangdong.
LEONARD T. FINK, ESQ., CHAD D. FUSS, ESQ., SPRINGEL & FINK LLP Attorneys for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff AIR VENT, INC.
JORGE A. RAMIREZ, ESQ., CHRISTOPHER D. PHIPPS, ESQ., Attorney for Third-Party Defendant, Powermax Electric Co. Ltd. Guangdong.
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO POWERMAX ELECTRIC CO. LTD. GUANGDONG'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCUMENT #77)
ECF NO. 83
JENNIFER A. DORSEY U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, the Parties, by and through their respective, undersigned, attorneys of record, stipulate and agree that the deadline for Air Vent, Inc. to file an Opposition to POWERMAX ELECTRIC CO. LTD. GUANGDONG's Motion for to Dismiss (Document #77) filed on December 23, 2021 shall be extended to January 25, 2022. The deadline for POWERMAX ELECTRIC CO. LTD. GUANGDONG's Reply shall be extended to February 8, 2022.
This is the second request for an extension. It is made due to a person necessary for Air Vent, Inc. to complete its opposition contracting COVID-19 and not being able to complete it by the current deadline. This request only seeks a one week continuance. It is not intended for an improper purpose or to cause delay, but is made in good faith after discussions between the aforementioned counsel of record.
ORDER
Based on the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the briefing deadlines on POWERMAX ELECTRIC CO. LTD. GUANGDONG's Motion to Dismiss (Document 77) are extended pursuant to the parties' stipulation.