From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saepharn v. Aramark Servs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 12, 2021
2:21-cv-00838-AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00838-AC

11-12-2021

LAI SAEPHARN, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation; DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants.

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Melinda S. Riechert, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Benjamin R. Eversole, Attorneys for Defendant ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.


MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Melinda S. Riechert, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Benjamin R. Eversole, Attorneys for Defendant ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

The Court has considered Plaintiff LAI SAEPHARN and Defendant ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.'s joint stipulation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) dismissing Plaintiffs claims against Defendant with prejudice. Each party to bear her/its own fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Saepharn v. Aramark Servs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 12, 2021
2:21-cv-00838-AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Saepharn v. Aramark Servs.

Case Details

Full title:LAI SAEPHARN, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., a Delaware…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 12, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00838-AC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)