From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saepharn v. Aramark Services, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 7, 2021
2:21-cv-00838 JAM AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00838 JAM AC

06-07-2021

LAI SAEPHARN, Plaintiffs v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., Defendants


HONORABLE JOHN A MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CONSENT ORDER

HONORABLE ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a "Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate." See 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)(5) and (c). According to E.D. Cal. LR. 305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the magistrate judge.

The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable, Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The parties shall please take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number: 2:21-cv-00838 AC.

Dated: June 4, 2021

Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.


Summaries of

Saepharn v. Aramark Services, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 7, 2021
2:21-cv-00838 JAM AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Saepharn v. Aramark Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAI SAEPHARN, Plaintiffs v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 7, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00838 JAM AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2021)