Opinion
2:21-cv-00687-MIS-KRS
05-01-2023
MARY SAENZ, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOVINGTON, a New Mexico municipality and political subdivision of the State of New Mexico; CEASAR JUAREZ, in his official and individual capacity; and MILES CROUCH, in his official and individual capacity, Defendants.
ZEBAS LAW FIRM, PLLC Joseph M. Zebas Attorneys for Plaintiff ATWOOD, MALONE, TURNER & SABIN, P.A. Bryan Evans Alyssa D. Rogers Attorneys for Defendants
ZEBAS LAW FIRM, PLLC Joseph M. Zebas Attorneys for Plaintiff
ATWOOD, MALONE, TURNER & SABIN, P.A. Bryan Evans Alyssa D. Rogers Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATED ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HONORABLE KEVIN R. SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time [Doc. 74], up to and including May 10, 2023, in which to file their Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court, having reviewed said Motion and, in particular, having noted that Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion, hereby finds that the Motion is well taken and should be granted.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants shall have up to and including May 10, 2023, in which to file their Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
APPROVED: