From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saenz-Payne v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01455 MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01455 MCE-EFB

09-28-2011

DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS CENTER; HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants.

PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053) CELIA McGUINNESS, Esq. (SBN 159420) CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198) LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN Attorneys for Plaintiff DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE KAMALA D. HARRIS, Esq. (SBN 146672) Attorney General of California DAVID A. CARRASCO, Esq. (SBN 160460) Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants: High Desert State Prison, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of California, and California Correctional Center


PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053)

CELIA McGUINNESS, Esq. (SBN 159420)

CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198)

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE

KAMALA D. HARRIS, Esq. (SBN 146672)

Attorney General of California

DAVID A. CARRASCO, Esq. (SBN 160460)

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants: High Desert State Prison,

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State

of California, and California Correctional Center

Civil Rights

STIPULATION TO DISMISS

WITH PREJUDICE BUT TO

RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER

DISPUTES; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Derrick Saenz-Payne and Defendants High Desert State Prison, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of California, and California Correctional Center, through their designated counsel, that

(1) After the Court, Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd, signs the Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order in this case (Docket No. 37), this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); but that
(2) The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Order, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Any and all disputes over enforcement of the Settlement Agreement and Order shall be heard and resolved by Magistrate Judge Drozd.
Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

By CELIA McGUINNESS

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

By DAVID A. CARRASCO

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

High Desert State Prison, Department of

Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of

California, and California Correctional Center

ORDER

Good cause having been shown, and the Court having signed the Settlement Agreement and Order in this matter, the case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, except (1) the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Order, incorporated herein by reference, and (2) any and all disputes over enforcement of the Settlement Agreement and Order shall be heard and resolved by Magistrate Judge Drozd as agreed by the parties.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the file at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Saenz-Payne v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01455 MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Saenz-Payne v. California

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01455 MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)