From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saenz-Payne v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01455 MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01455 MCE-EFB

09-26-2011

DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS CENTER; HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants.

PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053) CELIA McGUINNEsS, Esq. (SBN 159420) CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198) LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN Attorneys for Plaintiff DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE KAMALA D. HARRIS, Esq. (SBN 146672) Attorney General of California DAVID A. CARRASCO, Esq. (SBN 160460) Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants: High Desert State Prison, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of California, and California Correctional Center


PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053)

CELIA McGUINNEsS, Esq. (SBN 159420)

CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198)

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE

KAMALA D. HARRIS, Esq. (SBN 146672)

Attorney General of California

DAVID A. CARRASCO, Esq. (SBN 160460)

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants: High Desert State Prison,

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State

of California, and California Correctional Center

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER

1. Plaintiff DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE filed a First Amended Complaint in this action on July 9, 2010, to obtain recovery of damages for his alleged discriminatory experiences, denial of access, and denial of his civil rights, and to enforce provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. sections 12101 et seq., and California civil rights laws against Defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS CENTER; and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON relating to the condition of their public accommodations as of April 11, 2009, and continuing. Plaintiff has alleged that Defendants violated Title II of the ADA; California Civil Code sections 51, 52, 54, 54.1, 54.3 and 55; California Health & Safety Code section 11135; and California Government Code section 4450 et seq. by failing to provide full and equal access to their programs, services and activities at the public visiting areas of High Desert State Prison and the California Corrections Center, located at Susanville, California.
2. Defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS CENTER; and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON deny the allegations in the Complaint and by entering into this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order do not admit liability to any of the allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint filed in this action. Plaintiff DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE and defendants STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS CENTER; and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON , hereinafter collectively, "the parties," hereby enter into this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order for the purpose of resolving this lawsuit without the need for protracted litigation and without the admission of any liability.

JURISDICTION:

3. The parties to this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order agree that the Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1331 for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. sections 12101 et seq., and pursuant to supplemental jurisdiction for alleged violations of California law.
4. In order to avoid the costs, expense, and uncertainty of protracted litigation, the parties to this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order agree to entry of this Settlement Agreement to resolve all claims raised in the Complaint filed with this Court. Accordingly, they agree to the entry of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order without trial or further adjudication of any issues of fact or law.
WHEREFORE, the parties agree and stipulate to the Court's entry of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order, which provides as follows:

SETTLEMENT OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF:

5. This Order shall be a full, complete, and final disposition and settlement of Plaintiff's claims against Defendants. The parties agree that there has been no admission or finding of liability for any claim in this Action, and this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order shall not be construed as such.
6. The parties agree and stipulate that the agreed-upon modifications will be performed in compliance with the standards and specifications for disabled access as set forth in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24-2, and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, unless other standards are specifically agreed to in this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order.
7. Modifications: Defendants agree to perform modifications at High Desert State Prison (HDSP) and California Corrections Center (CCC), both located at Susanville, California. For High Desert State Prison, defendants will complete all the recommendations delineated in the "Survey, Report and Recommendations for High Desert State Prison" by Peter Margen, dated January 17, 2011, and incorporated herewith by reference as Attachment A. For California Correctional Center, defendants will complete all the recommendations delineated in the "Survey, Report and Recommendations for California Correctional Center" by Peter Margen, dated January 17, 2011, and incorporated herewith by reference as Attachment B. Defendants agree to institute written policies for both prisons as delineated in Attachment C, incorporated herewith by reference.
8. Timing of Injunctive Relief:
a. All modifications identified in Paragraph 7 will be completed no later than September 30, 2013, except for the items delineated in Attachment D, incorporated herewith by reference. The items in Attachment D will be completed within 30 days of defendants signing this Settlement Agreement.
b. In the event that unforeseen difficulties prevent Defendants from completing any of the agreed-upon injunctive relief within the designated time frame, Defendants or their counsel will notify Plaintiff's counsel in writing within 15 days of discovering the delay.
c. Policies as outlined in Attachment C, incorporated herewith by reference, will be implemented within 30 days of the signing of this Settlement Agreement. All current employees whose duties are affected by the policies will be trained within 21 days of
implementing the policies. All employees hired after the implementation date will be trained in these policies within 21 days of hiring.
9. Monitoring: Defendants or their counsel will notify Plaintiff's counsel when the modifications are completed, and in any case will provide a status report no later than 45 days from the entry of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order and every 180 days until corrective work is complete. Upon notifying plaintiff that the work has been completed, defendants will cooperate with plaintiff's counsel in arranging for a review of the facilities by Peter Margen within a reasonable time period. Attorney fees for enforcement of injunctive relief will not accrue during the monitoring period. Defendants will not be charged for Peter Margen's facilities review under this paragraph.

DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES AND COSTS:

10. The parties have reached an agreement as to plaintiff's damages, attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs. Defendants shall pay $ 96,300 as full and final resolution of Plaintiff's claims for all statutory, actual, and personal injury damages, including, but not limited to, general, compensatory, and special damages, attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs. Payment shall be made by one check made payable to "Paul L. Rein in Trust for DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE." Payment shall be received at the Law Offices of Paul L. Rein, 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A, Oakland, CA 94612 no later than November 28, 2011. If payment is not received by November 28, 2011, the Court will issue an Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt as delineated in paragraph 12, below. Upon receipt of (1) the executed Settlement Agreement and Order and (2) a fully completed Payee
Data Record Form (collectively referred to as "closing documents"), CDCR shall use reasonable efforts to process the necessary paperwork in order to procure a check for payment of the settlement amount. While CDCR will attempt to make the settlement payment as soon as practicable, the parties understand that this payment can take up to 180 days because of contingencies such as funding, including the absence of a state budget; a funding shortfall despite the presence of a state budget; delays within the State Controller's Office and other additional delays due to no fault on the part of CDCR. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no interest shall accrue or be paid on any sum made payable under the terms of this settlement agreement.

ENFORCEMENT:

11. Except for payment of damages and fees outlined in paragraph 12 below, if any party believes that another party has failed to fulfill any obligation under this Settlement Agreement, the Party shall, prior to initiating any court proceeding to remedy such failure, give written notice of the failure to the lead counsel of record for the other Party and attempt in good faith to resolve any such failure. The parties shall negotiate for not less than 60 days after receiving written notice and attempt to resolve their differences in good faith, before any court action is initiated.
12. Should defendants fail to pay the damages, attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs by November 28, 2011, the Court will issue an Order to Show Cause re: Contempt, requiring a CDCR representative at Deputy Warden level or higher to personally appear and explain why the payment has not been made. At the hearing on the OSC the Court will also entertain an oral motion from plaintiff's counsel for compensation for their attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs incurred in attending the
hearing.
13. All motions for enforcement of the terms of this Agreement shall be heard by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.

ENTIRE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER:

14. This Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order and Attachments A through D to this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order, which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth in this document, constitute the entire agreement between the signing parties on the matters of injunctive relief, damages, attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER BINDING ON PARTIES AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST:

15. This Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order shall be binding on the parties and all successors in interest. The parties have a duty to notify all such successors in interest of the existence and terms of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order during the period of the Court's jurisdiction of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order.

MUTUAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542:

16. Each of the parties to this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order understands and agrees that there is a risk and possibility that, subsequent to the execution of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order, any or all of them will incur, suffer or experience some further loss or damage with respect to the lawsuit which are unknown or unanticipated at the time this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order is signed. Except for all obligations required in this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order,
the parties intend that this Settlement Agreement apply to all such further loss with respect to the lawsuit, except those caused by the parties subsequent to the execution of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order. Therefore, except for all obligations required in this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order, this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order shall apply to and cover any and all claims, demands, actions and causes of action by the parties to this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order with respect to the lawsuit, whether the same are known, unknown or hereafter discovered or ascertained, and the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code are hereby expressly waived. Section 1542 provides as follows:
A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
17. Except for all obligations required in this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order, each of the parties to this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order, on behalf of each, their respective agents, representatives, predecessors, successors, heirs, partners and assigns, releases and forever discharges each other Party and all officers, directors, shareholders, subsidiaries, joint venturers, stockholders, partners, parent companies, employees, agents, attorneys, insurance carriers, heirs, predecessors, and representatives of each other Party, from all claims, demands, actions, and causes of action of whatever kind or nature, presently known or unknown, arising out of or in any way connected with the lawsuit.

TERM OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER:

18. This Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order shall be in full force and effect for a period of six years after the date of entry of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order.

SEVERABILITY:

19. If any term of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order is determined by any court to be unenforceable, the other terms of this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect.

SIGNATORIES BIND PARTIES:

20. Signatories on behalf of the parties represent that they are authorized to bind the parties to this Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order. This Settlement Agreement and [Proposed] Order may be signed in counterparts and a facsimile signature shall have the same force and effect as an original signature.

PLAINTIFF DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE

DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE

DEFENDANT STATE OF CALIFORNIA

By: ______

(Print name: ______)

DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS

By: ______

(Print name: ______)

DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS

CENTER

By: ______

(Print name: ______)

DEFENDANT HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON

By: ______

(Print name: ______)

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

PAUL L. REIN

CELIA McGUINNESS

CAT CABALO

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

DAVID A. CARRASCO

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DAVID A. CARRASCO

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

High Desert State Prison, Department of

Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of

California, and California Correctional Center

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Saenz-Payne v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01455 MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Saenz-Payne v. California

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK SAENZ-PAYNE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01455 MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2011)