From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saeco Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. Globe Motorists Supply Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1982
90 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

October 4, 1982


In an action to recover moneys due for goods sold and delivered, defendant Globe Motorists Supply Co., Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), entered December 1, 1981, which is in favor of plaintiff and against it, inter alia, in the amount of $14,730.24, upon an order of the same court, entered October 5, 1981, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, order vacated and plaintiff's motion is denied. The letter of May 21, 1981, upon which the award of partial summary judgment is based, conditioned the payment of the sum admitted on the acceptance of returns and the issuance of credits, which are the very issues upon which the parties are unable to agree. Hence, there is not an unqualified admission of a precise sum due (see Fleder v Itkin, 294 N.Y. 77). Titone, J.P., Weinstein, Gulotta and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Saeco Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. Globe Motorists Supply Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1982
90 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Saeco Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. Globe Motorists Supply Co.

Case Details

Full title:SAECO AUTOMOTIVE WAREHOUSE, INC., Respondent, v. GLOBE MOTORISTS SUPPLY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1982

Citations

90 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Graybar Elec. Co., Inc. v. J.A. Valenti Elec

The payment of this sum was conditioned upon a settlement being reached with the plaintiff concerning other…