Sadruddin v. City of Newark

15 Citing cases

  1. Elfar v. Twp. of Holmdel

    Civil Action 22-5367 (RK) (JBD) (D.N.J. Jul. 6, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    Zirger, 676 A.2d at 1071; see also Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F.Supp.2d 923, 928 (D.N.J. 1999) (“However, privity requires that the parties have such a connection of interest in the litigation and the subject matter that reason and justice precludes a relitigation of the issues.”).

  2. Stanton v. Greenstar Recycled Holdings, LLC

    Civil Action No. 10-5658 (GEB) (D.N.J. Mar. 31, 2011)

    In evaluating a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), the Court is required to accept as true the facts and allegations contained in the complaint and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and to view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J. 1999); see also Gen. Motors Corp. v. New A Chevrolet, Inc., 263 F.3d 296, 325 (3d Cir. 2001). "While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, a plaintiff's obligation to provide the `grounds' of his `entitlement to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do."

  3. Daniel S. v. Council Rock School District

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3531 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 25, 2007)   Cited 5 times

    Moreover, the claimant must set forth sufficient information to outline the elements of its claims or to permit inferences to be drawn that these elements exist. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2); Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957) (quoting Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J. 1999)). Where a District Court exercises jurisdiction over IDEA cases, they are to give due weight to the factual findings of the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ").

  4. Wayne Surgical Center, LLC v. Concentra Preferred Systems

    Civil Action No. 06-928 (D.N.J. Aug. 20, 2007)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that as an assignee of medical benefits, a medical provider has standing to sue under § 502 of ERISA

    Under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court is required to accept as true the facts and allegations contained in the complaint and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and to view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J. 1999); see also Gen. Motors Corp. v. New A Chevrolet, Inc., 263 F.3d 296, 325 (3d Cir. 2001). While the Court will accept as true all reasonable inferences and well-pleaded allegations, it will not accept "unsupported conclusions and unwarranted inferences" or legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.

  5. AULL v. McKEON-GRANO ASSOCIATES, INC.

    Civil Action No. 06-2752 (HAA) (D.N.J. Feb. 26, 2007)   Cited 11 times
    Finding six-month contractual limitations provision enforceable to bar employee's Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act claim as untimely

    Under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court is required to accept as true the facts and allegations contained in the complaint and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and to view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J. 1999); see also Gen. Motors Corp. v. New A Chevrolet, Inc., 263 F.3d 296, 325 (3d Cir. 2001). While the Court will accept as true all reasonable inferences and well-pleaded allegations, it will not accept "unsupported conclusions and unwarranted inferences" or legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.

  6. FALOR v. GS BILLBOARD, CONMACO/RECTOR L.P., CONMACO

    Civil Action No. 04-2373 (HAA) (D.N.J. Oct. 24, 2006)

    Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) requires the Court to accept as true the facts and allegations contained in a complaint and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and to view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J. 1999); see also Gen. Motors Corp. v. New A Chevrolet, Inc., 263 F.3d 296, 325 (3d Cir. 2001). Under Rule 12(b)(6), the claimant must set forth sufficient information in the complaint to provide defendant with notice of the plaintiff's claims, such as the elements of the claims.

  7. Post Confirmation Trust for Fleming Co. v. Friedland

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-CV-1118 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2006)

    Moreover, the claimant must set forth sufficient information to outline the elements of its claims or to permit inferences to be drawn that these elements exist. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2); Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957) (quoting Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J. 1999). DISCUSSION

  8. A.D.M. Club Management Systems v. Gary Jonas Computing, Ltd.

    Civil Action No. 05-3943 (HAA) (D.N.J. Sep. 19, 2006)   Cited 1 times

    Under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court is required to accept as true the facts and allegations contained in the complaint and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and to view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J. 1999); see also Gen. Motors Corp. v. New A Chevrolet, Inc., 263 F.3d 296, 325 (3d Cir. 2001). While the Court will accept as true all reasonable inferences and well-pleaded allegations, it will not accept "unsupported conclusions and unwarranted inferences" or legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.

  9. Kleinerman v. Chao

    Civil Action No. 05-2699 (HAA) (D.N.J. Jul. 12, 2006)   Cited 3 times

    Under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court is required to accept as true the facts and allegations contained in the complaint and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, and to view the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J. 1999); see also Gen. Motors Corp. v. New A Chevrolet, Inc., 263 F.3d 296, 325 (3d Cir. 2001). While the Court will accept as true all reasonable inferences and well-pleaded allegations, it will not accept "unsupported conclusions and unwarranted inferences" or legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.

  10. Jones v. Middletown Township

    Civil Action No. 05-CV-3719 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2006)

    LEGAL STANDARD In considering a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), the court "must take all the well pleaded allegations as true, construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and determine whether, under any reasonable reading of the pleadings, the plaintiff may be entitled to relief." Colburn v. Upper Darby Township, 838 F.2d 663, 665-66 (3d Cir. 1988) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1065 (1989); see Rocks v. City of Philadelphia, 868 F.2d 644, 645 (3d Cir. 1989). The question is whether the plaintiffs can prove any set of facts consistent with their allegations that will entitle them to relief, not whether they will ultimately prevail. See Hishon v. King Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984). Moreover, the claimants must set forth sufficient information to outline the elements of their claims or to permit inferences to be drawn that these elements exist. See FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(2);Sadruddin v. City of Newark, 34 F. Supp. 2d 923, 925 (D.N.J.,1999) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957)). A motion to dismiss may be granted only "if it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief."Conley, 355 U.S. at 45-46 (1957). DISCUSSION