From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saddozai v. Davis

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
18-cv-05558 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

18-cv-05558 BLF (PR)

10-26-2022

SHIKEB SADDOZAI, Plaintiff, v. RON DAVIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Docket No. 61)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against personnel at San Quentin State Prison (SQSP). Dkt. No. 1. On July 29, 2022, the Court ordered the reopening of this action and set a briefing schedule such that the Defendant Clawson's dispositive motion is due by October 31, 2022. Dkt. No. 59. Defendant has filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file a motion for summary judgement. Dkt. No. 61.

Having shown good cause, Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a motion for summary judgment no later than January 4, 2023, which is an extension of sixty-five (65) days. Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motion shall be filed no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date Defendant's motion is filed. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed.

This order terminates Docket No. 61.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Saddozai v. Davis

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
18-cv-05558 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Saddozai v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:SHIKEB SADDOZAI, Plaintiff, v. RON DAVIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

18-cv-05558 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)