From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SADA v. CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Oct 7, 2010
Case No. 6:09-cv-506-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 6:09-cv-506-Orl-31KRS.

October 7, 2010


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on motions to strike filed by the City of Altamonte Springs (Doc. 157) and the individual Defendants (Doc. 156). Collectively, the Defendants seek to strike the Plaintiff's responses (Doc. 152, Doc. 153) to their motions for summary judgment on the grounds that he did not provide the affidavits, depositions and exhibits upon which the responses were based.

The Court recently granted the Plaintiff's motion for leave to exceed the page limit (Doc. 154) in regard to these same responses, because there was no showing that the Defendants would suffer prejudice as a result of having to respond to an additional five pages of argument. However, the Plaintiff's failure to provide the affidavits, depositions and exhibits is clearly prejudicial, particularly where the Defendants are up against a deadline for filing their replies to those responses. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motions to strike (Doc. 156, Doc. 157) are GRANTED, and the Plaintiff's responses (Doc. 152, Doc. 153) to the motions for summary judgment are STRICKEN. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on October 7, 2010.


Summaries of

SADA v. CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Oct 7, 2010
Case No. 6:09-cv-506-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2010)
Case details for

SADA v. CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. SADA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, ROBERT PELTON…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

Case No. 6:09-cv-506-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2010)