From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sacks v. Hookey

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1907
55 Misc. 198 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)

Opinion

June, 1907.

Joseph Rosenzweig, for appellant.

Joseph A. Seidman, for respondent.


The appeal herein having been reached for argument, the respondent raises the point that the printed case has never been settled or signed by the justice before whom the action was tried. An examination of the record shows this to be true. "A case on appeal must be 'settled and signed' by the trial judge. A stipulation that it is a copy of the record filed does not cure the defect. The certificate must state that the case contains all the evidence." Code Civ. Pro., § 997; Gregory v. Clark, 53 A.D. 74. The case must, therefore, be sent to the lower court for amendment. Brush v. Blot, 11 A.D. 626.

Judgment will be affirmed, with costs, unless the appellant causes the return to be settled and signed within thirty days; or, if the same has been settled and signed, unless he causes the record to be amended so as to show that fact, and pays ten dollars costs and disbursements on this appeal.

SEABURY and PLATZEK, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, unless appellant causes return to be settled and signed within thirty days; or, if same has been settled, unless he causes record to be amended so as to show that fact, and pay ten dollars costs and disbursements on this appeal.


Summaries of

Sacks v. Hookey

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1907
55 Misc. 198 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)
Case details for

Sacks v. Hookey

Case Details

Full title:ISIDOR SACKS, Respondent, v . WILLIAM T. HOOKEY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1907

Citations

55 Misc. 198 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)
105 N.Y.S. 235