Opinion
May, 1905.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Hiscock, J., who dissented on the ground that it was against the weight of the evidence to hold that Clinton Watkins indorsed the note in suit for the accommodation of Omer Case, and this being so, it was incompetent and improper to admit the evidence of Omer Case with reference to payments made by said Watkins; and Stover, J., not voting.